How to Land Projects in California

BB&K Partner Seth Merewitz writes in Site Selection magazine how municipalities find ways around California’s barriers to attracting capital investment.

Site Selection – September 12, 2014

Until recently, California’s state-level economic development cupboard was looking a little bare — its 400 redevelopment agencies were dissolved in February 2012, property tax increment financing has been discontinued and Enterprise Zones are being phased out. That’s why some cities and towns in the Golden State are rethinking the business-attraction tools they still have at their disposal, on the local level, and are applying innovative solutions to landing the projects that they want in their jurisdictions.

New forms of public-private partnerships allow for non-redevelopment municipal assistance to produce local jobs, increase economic opportunities in industrial, manufacturing and retail sectors and deliver other public benefits to help boost the local economy. In addition, California has started several new tax credit programs that have just completed their inaugural round of awardees.

In June, the newly formed California Competes Tax Credit (CCTC) Committee approved $28.9 million in tax credits for29 companies expanding CCTC Committee are projected to help these companies create almost 6 , 000 jobs and generate more than $2 billion in investments across California. Awardees include: Samsung Semiconductor, Petco Animal Supplies, Amazon Fulfillment Services,, Hyundai Capital America, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., and iHerb, Inc.

Awardees are exempt from paying state income taxes in the amount awarded. An additional $ 150 million in tax credits will be allocated next fiscal year, and companies not selected in the first round are eligible to reapply once the next application period opens.

Projects are evaluated based on the factors required by statute, including total jobs created, total investment, average wage, economic impact, strategic importance and more. A total of 396 companies applied and requested more than $ 500 million in credits.

The California Competes Tax Credit is part of Gov. Jerry Brown’s Economic Development Initiative (GEDI), which he signed legislation to enact last year. The GEDI also includes a hiring credit for areas of high unemployment and poverty that went into effect on January 1, and a sales and use tax exemption for the purchase of manufacturing, biotech and R&D equipment that was available to companies as of July 1.

The Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) serves as California’s single point-of-contact for economic development and job creation efforts. GO-Biz offers a range of services to business owners, including: attraction, retention and expansion services, site selection, permit streamlining, clearing of regulatory hurdles, small business assistance, international trade development, assistance with state government and much more.

State Boosts Local Economic Development Efforts

The state’s passage of SB 470 in 2013 was a step to display the intent of the Legislature to promote economic development on a local level so that communities can enact local strategies to increase jobs, create economic opportunity and generate tax revenue for all levels of government.

Moreover, SB 470 provides local governments with new tools, at no cost to the state, that allow local governments to use their funds in a manner that promotes economic opportunity and to continue certain powers afforded to redevelopment agencies, with respect to properties owned by a city which were acquired to be sold or leased for economic opportunity purposes, as defined in the bill.

Traditionally, California cities have used state-authorized programs to assist development, such as the establishment of capital investment incentives to attract large manufacturing facilities. Cities are also authorized to create special bodies, such as industrial development authorities and community facilities districts, as a means of accessing different financing, including lease revenue, industrial development, private activity and special tax bonds and certificates of participation. However, more and more cities are starting to look for other innovative ways to assist new development.

In California, general law cities derive their power to assist private development from the state Constitution’s “police ” as well as specific state statutory authority.

Charter cities (such as Los Angeles, Sacramento, Visalia and San Diego) also have authority as to “municipal affairs” in any area not preempted by the state.

Tax-Sharing Package Approved For Heavy Equipment Auctioneer

Ritchie Bros. (NYSE and TSX: RBA), headquartered in Vancouver, BC, Canada, the world’s largest seller of used heavy equipment, with more than 1,400 full-time employees worldwide, went in search of a new location in California’s Great Central Valley. After a review of many potential communities in several counties, Ritchie Bros. decided to pursue a deal with the City of Tulare. What resulted was a forward looking economic development incentive agreement and development agreement outlining the company’s use of a site in the City of Tulare and calculation of the sales tax sharing over a 20-year period.

In exchange for developing the new location in the City of Tulare and meeting certain taxable sales tiers, the City agreed to a completely “performance based” incentive package that includes disbursement of various percentages of sales tax actually received by the City to Ritchie Bros. Ritchie Bros. agreed to invest not less than $10 million for land, infrastructure and buildings, retain specified numbers of employees for the location and various other ongoing commitments to benefit the City, tourism and local businesses. In addition, the auction site would be available for City, civic and school functions for other events throughout the year when the site is not in active use.

The direct community benefit include more jobs, new sales tax, and new visitors to the multiple-day auctions several times per year. In addition, there is tremendous economic “spin off” to other business in the City of Tulare to businesses related to heavy equipment. All of this was documented in an Economic Benefit Analysis presented to the City.

Toxic Site Is Re-Purposed

One particular example highlights the flexibility and power of a public-private partnership at the local level without any redevelopment tax increment. Primestor Development Inc., a certified minority business enterprise, is nearing completion this month of Azalea, a 370,000 sq.-ft. (34,300-sq.-m.) regional mall on a 30-acre (12-hectare) former brown field site in the City of South Gate, just south of Downtown Los Angeles. At the grand opening in August, the regional mall was 97-percent leased with a single and intentional vacancy awaiting the “right” tenant.

This new shopping center was assisted by the City’s innovative incentive structure and the infrastructure financing and fee waiver agreement. The City not only transferred adjacent parcels and constructed offsite improvements, but also provided project financing and will participate in project construction cost savings and excess developer return.

The developer is providing substantial public amenities, including a public plaza available for exclusive City events up to six times per year, and a City Hall annex. The developer also agreed to pay prevailing wages and institute a local-hiring preference plan, as well as provide a marketing budget for the public plaza and fund a repair and replacement reserve. The developer also agreed to pay the City for its expenses related to the project.

Municipal Powers Remain Intact

Azalea and the Ritchie Bros. Auction site are important projects in post-redevelopment California. Many local jurisdictions are realizing that they in fact have significant authority and potential monetary and non-monetary resources to assist in the revitalization of downtown districts, create value in suburban neighborhoods and renew aging infrastructure. Though local governments are prohibited from making outright gifts of public funds, cities can provide financial assistance, including loans, grants, subsidies and tax incentives and revenue sharing, if the program supports an identifiable public purpose and benefits the community.

Along with new authority for local agencies in SB 470, the State in AB 562 has also placed a new requirement on cities to issue a report about any project receiving any type of “economic development subsidy” of $100,000 or more and its benefits to the public before approving the subsidy. Moreover, prevailing wage laws continue to challenge the structuring of incentives and subsidies.

The State and cities are again recognizing that their involvement can make a big difference in the feasibility and value of an economic development project. Success requires a collaborative relationship between the city and the developer and a willingness to utilize the state tools and available local authority.

This article originally appeared in the October 2014 of Site Selection magazine. Reprinted with permission.